Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 3:41 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
I wonder if you'd get different results with inReach Send Interval set to 10 or 30 minutes. As I had mentioned, my on-device tracklog points tended to cluster around the time that inReach tracking was sent, so my working speculation is that inReach communication frequency influences the activity tracklog even when "High Detail" tracklog is enabled.
Here's a few other references to the same problem I experienced (need to read through the comments on the Garmin Forum threads):
Here's a few other references to the same problem I experienced (need to read through the comments on the Garmin Forum threads):
- GPSrChive
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3937
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:29 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
Similar test performed today with:scotte wrote: ↑Thu Sep 01, 2022 4:10 pm I wonder if you'd get different results with inReach Send Interval set to 10 or 30 minutes. As I had mentioned, my on-device tracklog points tended to cluster around the time that inReach tracking was sent, so my working speculation is that inReach communication frequency influences the activity tracklog even when "High Detail" tracklog is enabled.
- GPSMAP 66sr configured to record the track log with 'Auto - More Often'.
- MINI 2 configured with a 10 minute Tracking 'Send Interval' and 'Activity Recording' set to 'High Detail'.
Test Results
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 3:41 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
Thanks - interesting indeed. Hopefully enough data will be gathered by current MINI 2 owners to track down what's amiss here for some folks. Very odd.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:31 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
Tried out my new mini 2 tracking yesterday, and ya it was lousy. It’s good enough to get you back to where you want to go, but your going to have to use discretion and have some navigation skills. Oh well, not a surprise. It’s king of like a half size version of an old gps 12, with inreach. It gives you off grid communication and your position, at a light weight, now you just need your map and compass.
Last edited by Navigatorman on Sat Nov 25, 2023 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- GPSrChive
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3937
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:29 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
Lousy how? What Tracking interval was used?Navigatorman wrote: ↑Sat Nov 25, 2023 5:23 pm Tried out my new mini 2 tracking yesterday, and ya it was lousy.
How about the activity recording?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 12:44 am
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
Activity track logging behavior with inReach Send Interval set to at least to 10 minutes appears problematic and inconsistent. Some examples I've already seen here on a new device with latest V4.22:
1. Activity Recording = Standard
According to Garmin this is supposed to match the Send Interval. E.g. point for point to save battery. However, what I am seeing here is:
a) multiple activity track points (in my case typically 5 to 7) logged immediately prior to sending each inReach TrackPoint. Presumably this is occurring in the window while it's waiting to establish connection with the satellite. Definitely not one for one.
b) Under some circumstances (e.g. one example below after a message was sent) Standard Activity Recording immediately stopped honoring the matching of the Send Interval and midstream started logging continual Activity points between the inReach track points.
2 Activity Recording = High Detail
In some instances having this set will not log Activity track points between inReach sent points (e.g. same behavior as Standard), yet other times it will log detailed Activity trackpoints in between. Unclear at this stage what the triggering for these circumstances are.
Here is one example walking up to a peak, sending an inReach message, and returning on the same trail. The device remained configured with Send Interval at 10 minutes and Activity Recording at Standard, but changed behavior midstream:
*** edited to conform with forum posting guidelines ***
And only on the way up better showing the much commented "Standard" behavior with the clustered points:
*** edited to conform with forum posting guidelines ***
And closer up of the cluster detail:
*** edited to conform with forum posting guidelines ***
1. Activity Recording = Standard
According to Garmin this is supposed to match the Send Interval. E.g. point for point to save battery. However, what I am seeing here is:
a) multiple activity track points (in my case typically 5 to 7) logged immediately prior to sending each inReach TrackPoint. Presumably this is occurring in the window while it's waiting to establish connection with the satellite. Definitely not one for one.
b) Under some circumstances (e.g. one example below after a message was sent) Standard Activity Recording immediately stopped honoring the matching of the Send Interval and midstream started logging continual Activity points between the inReach track points.
2 Activity Recording = High Detail
In some instances having this set will not log Activity track points between inReach sent points (e.g. same behavior as Standard), yet other times it will log detailed Activity trackpoints in between. Unclear at this stage what the triggering for these circumstances are.
Here is one example walking up to a peak, sending an inReach message, and returning on the same trail. The device remained configured with Send Interval at 10 minutes and Activity Recording at Standard, but changed behavior midstream:
*** edited to conform with forum posting guidelines ***
Spoiler
And only on the way up better showing the much commented "Standard" behavior with the clustered points:
*** edited to conform with forum posting guidelines ***
Spoiler
And closer up of the cluster detail:
*** edited to conform with forum posting guidelines ***
Spoiler
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2019 3:41 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
Your description and pictures match exactly with my experiences with the device from over a year ago which resulted in me returning the device. It is unfortunate that the MINI 2 is still not usable for track logs.
- GPSrChive
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3937
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:29 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2022 12:44 am
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
More detail after some testing here, the erroneous Activity tracking on at least my device is resulting from a combination of inReach Tracking being enabled, and the state of the Auto Track setting.
1. inReach Tracking Enabled and:
If Auto Track is ON (to automatically initiate tracking at power on):
Standard recording will log track points every 10 minutes. It will do this regardless of whether the Send Interval is set to 10, but also incorrectly if set to 20 or 30 minutes.
High Detail recording likewise will also incorrectly log track points every 10 minutes regardless of whether the Send Interval is set to 10, 20 or 30 Minutes. High detail should log continuously regardless.
The inReach send intervals of 10, 20 & 30 minutes were respected in regards to the transmission of trackpoints to Mapshare.
I didn't try longer send intervals.
If Auto Track is OFF, and Tracking is manually started:
Standard recording will still incorrectly log track points every 10 minutes regardless of whether the Send Interval is set to 10, 20 or 30 Minutes.
High Detail recording now does behave and will continually log highly detailed trackpoints throughout and irrespective of the send interval e.g. it results in what would be considered a "normal" track.
I only tested this on 10, 20 & 30 minutes and didn't try longer send intervals.
2. inReach Tracking OFF
Activity tracking works continually as expected.
It works fine either with Auto Track set to on and after powering up, or if tracking is manually started.
Standard recording results in a continuous but rough and sparsely populated track (but significantly better than 10 minute intervals).
High Detail recording results in a continuous "normal" track that faithfully shows most twists and turns.
As a rough guide, over a short weaving 100m test loop here Standard logged 8 trackpoints, while High Detail logged 18. This was repeatable.
The other issues remain:
* In Standard detail, multiple Activity points (clusters of 4-7) logged through the ~20 second inReach single tracking point send window.
* The previous erratic on the fly mode switch between 10 second "Standard" logging and then continuous logging immediately after an inReach message was sent.
There still could be other issues or differences in what other users are seeing, but given all the similar feedback so far the device is clearly still flaky.
1. inReach Tracking Enabled and:
If Auto Track is ON (to automatically initiate tracking at power on):
Standard recording will log track points every 10 minutes. It will do this regardless of whether the Send Interval is set to 10, but also incorrectly if set to 20 or 30 minutes.
High Detail recording likewise will also incorrectly log track points every 10 minutes regardless of whether the Send Interval is set to 10, 20 or 30 Minutes. High detail should log continuously regardless.
The inReach send intervals of 10, 20 & 30 minutes were respected in regards to the transmission of trackpoints to Mapshare.
I didn't try longer send intervals.
If Auto Track is OFF, and Tracking is manually started:
Standard recording will still incorrectly log track points every 10 minutes regardless of whether the Send Interval is set to 10, 20 or 30 Minutes.
High Detail recording now does behave and will continually log highly detailed trackpoints throughout and irrespective of the send interval e.g. it results in what would be considered a "normal" track.
I only tested this on 10, 20 & 30 minutes and didn't try longer send intervals.
2. inReach Tracking OFF
Activity tracking works continually as expected.
It works fine either with Auto Track set to on and after powering up, or if tracking is manually started.
Standard recording results in a continuous but rough and sparsely populated track (but significantly better than 10 minute intervals).
High Detail recording results in a continuous "normal" track that faithfully shows most twists and turns.
As a rough guide, over a short weaving 100m test loop here Standard logged 8 trackpoints, while High Detail logged 18. This was repeatable.
The other issues remain:
* In Standard detail, multiple Activity points (clusters of 4-7) logged through the ~20 second inReach single tracking point send window.
* The previous erratic on the fly mode switch between 10 second "Standard" logging and then continuous logging immediately after an inReach message was sent.
There still could be other issues or differences in what other users are seeing, but given all the similar feedback so far the device is clearly still flaky.
- GPSrChive
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3937
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:29 pm
Re: Is the MINI 2 usable for accurate on-device track logs?
We have shared the information you provided with Garmin support.
Thank you for the detailed post!
Thank you for the detailed post!