Oregon 7x0 3-Axis Compass vs. Battery Voltage
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:31 am
Have dealt with this issue for years through the course of several Garmin 3-axis units, but my recent experience with a new Oregon 700 has proved more problematic than ever in the past. Sent the following to Garmin today:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve owned a number of Garmin handheld products with a 3-axis compass chip, and have always had to exercise care about the battery voltage when performing calibration. However, my new Oregon 700 has taken the problem to a new low.
I’m sure that if you dig into your design, you’ll find that a) the compass chip is NOT operating off a board regulated supply, and that b) the chip being used is either unable to be configured for internal regulation, or to save on power, one of the optional internal regulation modes is not selected, and therefore c) the behavior of the chip can and will vary considerably depending upon supply voltage. This results in erratic display of the 3-axis compass heading.
For previous units (e.g., Oregon 450), it seemed possible to perform calibration a short while after a newly charged pair of ‘hot’ NiMH cells had been installed and the voltage allowed to drop a bit, and the performance of the compass chip, noted by consistently displayed headings on the screen, was adequate until the cells neared depletion. Since cell voltage was reasonably constant over the period of use of that pair of cells when I handled things in that manner, the compass performance was not an issue.
However, for whatever reason, I find this workaround for this design issue MUCH more difficult to duplicate on the Oregon 700. It seems the 3-axis chip is responding far more sensitively to supply voltage, making it necessary to recalibrate frequently from the point at which newly charged cells have settled a bit until their depletion. As before, no attempt is made to calibrate with high Vcc of a freshly charged pair of cells, but I cannot find any ‘happy medium’ anywhere in the cell voltage that, after calibration, allows the chip to behave normally for any extended period of time.
I have not directly measured compass performance vs. supply voltage on this new Oregon 700 unit, so I can’t say just how many mV loss it takes after calibration to throw the chip into a tailspin, but if you haven’t already investigated this issue on this or previous models, I’d certainly be prepared to provide the evidence.
-------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve owned a number of Garmin handheld products with a 3-axis compass chip, and have always had to exercise care about the battery voltage when performing calibration. However, my new Oregon 700 has taken the problem to a new low.
I’m sure that if you dig into your design, you’ll find that a) the compass chip is NOT operating off a board regulated supply, and that b) the chip being used is either unable to be configured for internal regulation, or to save on power, one of the optional internal regulation modes is not selected, and therefore c) the behavior of the chip can and will vary considerably depending upon supply voltage. This results in erratic display of the 3-axis compass heading.
For previous units (e.g., Oregon 450), it seemed possible to perform calibration a short while after a newly charged pair of ‘hot’ NiMH cells had been installed and the voltage allowed to drop a bit, and the performance of the compass chip, noted by consistently displayed headings on the screen, was adequate until the cells neared depletion. Since cell voltage was reasonably constant over the period of use of that pair of cells when I handled things in that manner, the compass performance was not an issue.
However, for whatever reason, I find this workaround for this design issue MUCH more difficult to duplicate on the Oregon 700. It seems the 3-axis chip is responding far more sensitively to supply voltage, making it necessary to recalibrate frequently from the point at which newly charged cells have settled a bit until their depletion. As before, no attempt is made to calibrate with high Vcc of a freshly charged pair of cells, but I cannot find any ‘happy medium’ anywhere in the cell voltage that, after calibration, allows the chip to behave normally for any extended period of time.
I have not directly measured compass performance vs. supply voltage on this new Oregon 700 unit, so I can’t say just how many mV loss it takes after calibration to throw the chip into a tailspin, but if you haven’t already investigated this issue on this or previous models, I’d certainly be prepared to provide the evidence.